Podcast | All you need to know about the protests in Maharashtra

A observe the headlines right now:Maratha Kranti Morcha calls off shutdown in and around Mumbai: The shutdown became observed in Mumbai Thane Navi Mumbai Palghar Raigad and Satara and some incidents of violence were suggested. New born s frame discovered deserted inside AirAsia flight bathroom suspect held in New Delhi: The airline stated a physician had showed that the infant turned into delivered on board the flight from Guwahati.At least 31 killed over 20 injured in blast in Quetta as balloting keeps in Pakistan: The us of a s media regulatory authority has directed TV channels to stop airing election-related content and discussions.Don t take action in opposition to the ones excluded from draft residents register Centre tells Assam: Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal said his authorities could provide safety to all Indian residents. Mob attacks four men transporting a lifeless buffalo in Uttar Pradesh s Hathras: Meanwhile CM Adityanath said mob lynching incidents are being given unnecessary importance.Rajya Sabha passes invoice in order to allow seizure of property of fugitive financial offenders: The Lok Sabha had exceeded the bill on July 19.Sensex rises to all-time high despite overdue promoting Nifty closes almost flat: The stocks that received the maximum at the Sensex were State Bank of India Adani Ports Tata Steel Vedanta and ONGC. NGT criticises Delhi government says no significant development made in cleansing Yamuna: The green tribunal said paintings on 14 sewage remedy plants to rejuvenate the river changed into but to begin and wondered the competence of officials in price.At least 50 killed 78 injured in series of bomb attacks in southwestern Syria: The Islamic State group has claimed obligation for the blasts. Delhi High Court asks tax department to allow e-filing of returns without Aadhaar information: Taxpayers without an Aadhaar have to be capable of report returns on-line as the closing date to link it with PAN has been prolonged the court stated New Delhi forty four am Congress president Rahul Gandhi with BJP veteran L K Advani and his daughter Pratibha Advani on the launch of Karan Thapar s e book in New Delhi on Wednesday. (Express https://www.usgbc.org/people/garb-kerone/0011263205 Photo) Speaking publicly for the primary time after his speech in Parliament on the no-self assurance movement in Lok Sabha Congress president Rahul Gandhi reiterated his method to combat political warring parties but not hate them. Being asked to speak at a e book launch in which he become the visitor of honour Rahul alluded to his gesture of hugging the Prime Minister inside the Lok Sabha even as discussing the fight he might also salary with those he concept it turned into essential to disagree with and to combat but not hate . Referring to former deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister LK Advani who changed into within the target audience on the release of journalist Karan Thapar s memoirs The Devil s Advocate Rahul said You can fight a person however hate is an lively choice you are making. I disagree with Mr Advani I can fight him every inch but I don t need to hate him I can hug him and fight him. He delivered jokingly now BJP MPs step returned once they see me possibly wondering if I will hug them . Mr Karan Singh is right here who has taught me loads approximately our usa and approximately our religion that teaches us to now not hate. My pal Mr (Sitaram) Yechury (General Secretary CPM) is here too we will fight the dislike together however we don t need to hate them. Now I don t understand if they (BJP leaders) feel that way he said. READ come across BJP MPs they take steps again wondering I ll hug them: Rahul Gandhi Referring to a ship trip he took in the Mekong river in Vietnam in which the boatman scarred as a child by an American bomb that killed his mother while he changed into too little to apprehend its implications Rahul spoke of ways the boatman defined the way he went on to combat the Americans with the Viet Cong were given hit by means of a grenade inside the head so much so that it left a massive hole in his head . Yet said Rahul the boatman said he did not hate the Americans. He fought them due to the fact he needed to fight them but no longer hated them. Rahul said You can combat someone but hate is an lively preference you're making. I disagree with Mr Advani I can combat him every inch but I don t want to hate him I can hug him and combat him. (PTI/File) Earlier Congress MP Shashi Tharoor examine out 3 extracts from Thapar s book the primary approximately time spent with former Pakistan PM Benazir Bhutto at Oxford the second about then Home Minister P V Narasimha Rao calling Thapar to attempt to get a line deleted from an interview and the 1/3 from his brief aborted interview with PM Narendra Modi while he was the Gujarat Chief Minister. Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh became also gift and unveiled a replica of the e book along Rahul. Among others gift were Congress leaders Salman Khursheed Jyotiradatiya Scindia and RPN Singh former Vice President Hamid Ansari former Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit and MPs Naresh Gujral Ahmed Patel and Digvijaya Singh. Thapar was in communication along with his colleague for years Rajdeep Sardesai after Rahul spoke. The dialogue started out with Sardesai asking Thapar why he tried to mediate between former deputy PM Advani and the previous Pakistan High Commissioner Ashraf Qazi and why he did that as a journalist . Thapar stated he felt excellent approximately playing a function in bringing countries collectively and by no means found out some thing on the time arguing that it did no longer inhibit his paintings as a journalist. In an in depth segment of the book Thapar recounts his 3-and-a-1/2 minute interview which Modi terminated after soliciting for a glass of water. Thapar has alleged that the entire BJP brass turned into told to boycott him at the behest of PM Modi. Thapar stated senior and junior BJP ministers and spokespersons who had been giving him interviews until 2015 stopped giving them entirely notwithstanding Modi ending their assembly by pronouncing Karan I love you we are able to meet and devour a meal in Delhi . For all the present day India News down load Indian Express App Tags: BJP Narendra Modi Rahul Gandhi NEW DELHI: Billionaire Anil Ambani has written to Congress president Rahul Gandhi refuting allegations of his Reliance Group missing enjoy to get the Rafale fighter jet deal and said the authorities had no role in French Group Dassault picking up his organization as a local companion. In a -page letter written on December 12 2017 Ambani defined to Gandhi who has been attacking the authorities over the Rafale deal why his Reliance Group bagged the multi-billion dollar mission. Highlight Rafale scam Rahul Gandhi tells partymenUndeterred with the aid of the rebuttal from France https://www.polygon.com/users/garbazkeron and the Modi authorities Congress president Rahul Gandhi on Sunday requested birthday party workers to take the Rafale rip-off to the grassroots to acquaint them with what he known as turned into usual corruption beneath the BJP regime. Invoking his own family s respectful relationship with the Gandhi own family over generations Ambani stated he turned into individually saddened by the unfortunate statements in opposition to him and his institution by using numerous functionaries of the Congress birthday celebration. Not simplest can we have the vital experience but we are also the leaders in numerous essential regions of defense manufacture he stated within the letter written at the remaining day of campaigning for the Gujarat assembly polls that became marked by using political dust-slinging over the Rafale fighter jet deal. He said Reliance Defence has the biggest shipyard in the non-public area at Pipavav in Gujarat and is presently constructing 5 Naval Offshore Patrol Vessels (NOPVs) for the Indian Navy and 14 Fast Patrol Vessels for the Indian Coast Guard. Reward of four billion : Rahul Gandhi once more assaults PM Modi over Rafale deal The selection of the Government of India to purchase 36 Rafale fighter jets from France was made thru an inter-governmental agreement signed among the two international locations. Also some of these 36 aircraft are being synthetic in France and might be delivered on a fly away foundation from Dassault production facilities in France to the Indian Air Force and no Indian employer has any function to play he stated. Dassault chose Reliance Group as its joint venture partner to fulfill the offset or export duty element of the deal and this was an unbiased agreement between corporate private sector entities and Governments had no role to play in this rely he wrote. Gandhi has been attacking the authorities on the deal which he claims become inked at a miles higher fee than the only the preceding UPA regime had negotiated. Last week during the debate at the no-self belief movement in the Lok Sabha he accused the government of changing the https://www.avitop.com/cs/members/garbazkeron.aspx deal to benefit one businessman . Ambani within the letter stated his institution s joint assignment with Dassault became to make additives and structures typically for the aerospace and defence sectors. This joint project with Dassault Aviation will result in creation of heaps of jobs in India presenting of treasured schooling and skill-sets to Indian engineers in aerospace/defence manufacturing quarter and also will offer large scale enterprise opportunities to hundreds of MSMEs SMEs and begin-united statesinside the united states and will further beautify our revel in and talents he wrote. Also Dassault would considerably contribute to high era switch and decorate overall defence production experience. Ambani stated his father Dhirubhai built the sector s largest integrated petrochemicals and refinery complicated in India without even having a formal schooling a good deal less any experience or legacy. In his phrases you have to receive an possibility to carry out. It s now not experience but the mind-set dedication and the purpose of a strong India that need to engage us all he wrote adding that the information he has introduced out could be beneficial to Gandhi. Similar letters also went to other senior Congress leaders inclusive of the birthday celebration s verbal exchange department in price Randeep Surjewala. In his letter Ambani asserted that no longer handiest did his company have the revel in but we are also the leaders in several crucial areas of defence manufacture . He said statements by using Congress leaders have saddened him. I fully admire that within the midst of the heat and dirt of political campaigning as in the current context of elections in Gujarat lots has often been stated. Nonetheless considering that my whole circle of relatives and I starting with my respected father have had the privilege of playing a completely respectful dating with the Gandhi own family over generations as well as the Congress birthday celebration for the beyond more than 4 many years these statements have saddened and hurt our sentiments he said inside the letter. New Delhi: Eight months in the past billionaire Anil Ambani wrote to Congress President Rahul Gandhi refuting allegations of his Reliance Group lacking enjoy to get the Rafale fighter jet deal and said the government had no position in French Group Dassault choosing up his employer as a local accomplice.In a -page letter written on December 12 2017 Mr Ambani explained to Mr Gandhi who has been attacking the authorities over the Rafale deal why his Reliance Group bagged the multi-billion greenback project.Invoking his family s respectful courting with the Gandhi own family over generations Mr Ambani said he turned into individually saddened with the aid of the unlucky statements in opposition to him and his organization by using numerous functionaries of the Congress birthday party. Not most effective can we have the vital experience however we also are the leaders in numerous critical regions of defense manufacture he said inside the letter written at the closing day of campaigning for the Gujarat assembly polls that become marked via political dust-slinging over the Rafale fighter jet deal.He said Reliance Defence has the most important shipyard inside the personal quarter at Pipavav in Gujarat and is currently constructing five Naval Offshore Patrol Vessels (NOPVs) for the Indian Navy and 14 Fast Patrol Vessels for the Indian Coast Guard. The selection of the Government of India to purchase 36 Rafale fighter jets from France changed into made thru an inter-governmental settlement signed between the 2 nations. Also a majority of these 36 plane are being manufactured in France and might be delivered on a fly away basis from Dassault manufacturing centers in France to the Indian Air Force and no Indian corporation has any function to play he stated.Dassault pick out Reliance Group as its joint mission partner to fulfill the offset or export duty factor of the deal and this changed into an impartial agreement among company non-public quarter entities and Governments had no function to play on this be counted he wrote.Mr Gandhi has been attacking the authorities on the deal which he claims changed into inked at a much higher rate than the one the previous UPA regime had negotiated. Last week at some stage in the talk at the no-self assurance movement in the Lok Sabha he accused the government of converting the deal to benefit one businessman .Mr Ambani in the letter stated his organization s joint mission with Dassault was to make components and structures in the main for the aerospace and defence sectors. This joint undertaking with Dassault Aviation will cause creation of hundreds of jobs in India offering of treasured training and skill-sets to Indian engineers in aerospace/ defence production sector and will also offer big scale enterprise opportunities to loads of MSMEs SMEs and start-u.S.In the u . S . A . And could in addition decorate our experience and skills he wrote.Also Dassault could substantially make contributions to excessive era switch and enhance average defence production revel in.Mr Ambani stated his father Dhirubhai built the sector s biggest integrated petrochemicals and refinery complicated in India without even having a proper schooling much less any enjoy or legacy. In his phrases you need to take delivery of an possibility to carry out. It s not enjoy but the mindset willpower and the purpose of a robust India that have to have interaction us all he wrote including that the information he has delivered out might be beneficial to Gandhi.Similar letters additionally went to different senior Congress leaders such as the birthday party s communication branch in-fee Randeep Surjewala.In his letter Mr Ambani asserted that now not most effective did his company have the enjoy but we also are the leaders in several vital areas of defence manufacture . He said statements by using Congress leaders have saddened him. I fully recognize that inside the midst of the warmth and https://ask.fm/sanwichgave dirt of political campaigning as within the current context of elections in Gujarat loads has regularly been stated. Nonetheless thinking about that my complete family and I beginning with my reputable father have had the privilege of playing a very respectful dating with the Gandhi family over generations as well as the Congress party for the beyond more than 4 a long time those statements have saddened and harm our sentiments he said within the letter. NEW DELHI: Congress president Rahul Gandhi stated on Wednesday that BJP MPs take two steps back on seeing him these days fearing that he may additionally embody them. BJP leaders had earlier criticised Gandhi for hugging PM Narendra Modi in Parliament last week. Gandhi stated he may additionally have a distinction of opinion with BJP leaders but he doesn t want to hate them. You can fight a person with all of your may but hate is a preference... And I assume that is some thing this is very crucial to apprehend. I may disagree with Mr (LK) Advani I may additionally have a very one of a kind thought of the u . S . A . From that of Mr Advani. And I can fight Mr Advani on every single inch but I don t want to hate him he stated at a e book launch wherein the senior BJP leader changed into additionally present. NEW DELHI: The celibate nature of Sabarimala temple s presiding deity Lord Ayyappa is included by using the Constitution the Supreme Court became on Wednesday told by means of a society which antagonistic a plea seeking entry of girls of all age businesses into the shrine. A five-judge Constitution bench headed via Chief Justice Dipak Misra was informed via former Attorney General and senior suggest K Parasaran acting for the Nair Service Society that the most effective consideration become the celibate nature of deity and which needs to be preserved. Lord Ayyappa s character as a Naishtika Brahmachari (everlasting celibate) is blanketed through the Constitution he advised the bench which also comprised justices R F Nariman A M Khanwilkar D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra. Those coming to the Sabarimala temple must no longer come in the enterprise of younger ladies. Children mom sisters are exceptions. The motive is that the ones coming to the temple need to not comply with the brahmcharya (celibacy) however also they need to seem to follow it the senior attorney said. Parasaran said Article 25 (2) which throws open public Hindu non secular establishments for all lessons and sections of society can be applied only to social reforms and might not follow to subjects of faith blanketed below Article 26 (b) of the Constitution. Article 26 (b) provides proper to every religious denominations to manipulate its very own affairs in count of religion . Article 25(2) reiterates the item of Article 17 (abolition of touchability) within the particular context of temples and Hindus to send a loud and clean message he said. You (Parasaran) say that throwing open public temples for all sections has no religious connotations. What will manifest if the kingdom comes out with a regulation to convey social reforms and permit ladies within the temple the bench asked. The senior lawyer stated that the specific nature of the deity must be stored in thoughts while dealing with the constitutional validity of the age-antique exercise. He then mentioned Article 15 (2) of the Constitution which supplied the right to access to all citizens to locations like stores hotels and different locations and stated it did now not mention public temples. The present case does now not contain a social issue however a spiritual difficulty. By using 25(2) you (court docket) will reform a religion out of its identity he said responding to the question that the state may enact law to permit ladies within the temple. At the outset he said that Kerala is an knowledgeable society and ninety six per cent of its girls are knowledgeable and independent. It is a matrilineal society. Therefore to assume that the exercise of the Sabarimala Temple is primarily based on patriarchy is essentially incorrect he said. Earlier the bench had determined that in a patriarchal society ladies are treated as chattels and educated in view that delivery to conduct themselves in a selected way. The exercise of Sabarimala Temple is not comparable to Sati and in fact Sati itself has now not connection to the Hindu faith he stated adding the better halves of Dasaratha did not devote Sati after their husbands loss of life. The courtroom ought to not method the difficulty of Sabarimala with the notions of patriarchy he stated adding that Hinduism has been a tolerant faith. The court ought to listen to activist voices but it also it ought to similarly concentrate to voices which are looking for to shield traditions he stated. The Hindu faith has been following the proper to equality in view that time immemorial and Lord Shiva has ardhanarishwara (half male and half of girl) form as nicely. Legislature is Brahma government is Vishnu and Shiva is judiciary because simplest Shiva has the ardhanarishwara shape which may be equated to Article 14 right to equality he stated. We have to no longer continue with the presumption that the humans in historical instances knew nothing and that we know better in all aspects of life he said. By abolishing the practice the very person of the spiritual group may be irreparably altered which affects the rights of devotees under Article 25(1) (freedom of religion) he said. The hearing at the pleas filed by way of Indian Young Lawyers Association and others hard the ban might resume on Thursday. Earlier the apex court had made it clear that the ban on entry of ladies inside the age institution of 10-50 years into the Sabarimala temple would be tested on constitutional ethos and had requested the temple board to set up that the restrict become an critical and crucial a part of non secular faith. It became reputedly not in agreement with the argument of the Travancore Devaswom Board jogging the over 800-12 months-old temple that the exercise and belief that have endured uninterrupted can not be tested on the ground of modern ethos . The Kerala authorities had supported the access of ladies of all age companies into the temple. The apex court had on October 13 remaining yr referred the difficulty to a Constitution bench after framing 5 enormous questions along with whether the exercise of banning access of women of that specific age group into the temple amounted to discrimination and violated their essential rights under the Constitution. NEW DELHI: Arguing in guide of a ban on girls inside the Kerala s Sabarimala temple an influential body representing the Nair network in Kerala said that the temple s deity Lord Ayappa himself doesn t need the presence of girls between 10 and 50 .Allowing them would change the character of the deity and the temple said senior lawyer K Parasaran acting for the Nair Service Society.The petitioners had argued for the worshippers but the deity additionally has a right that has to be blanketed. The factor of view of the deity who has its very own criminal character as in line with law need to be addressed the ninety-year-old lawyer who become India s pinnacle law officer again in the eighties advised a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court.The charter bench headed via Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra is listening to a group of petitions that mission the traditional ban at the access of women among 10 and 50 years of age inside the famous Sabarimala temple.Women of an age to menstruate are limited from getting into the temple as its presiding deity Lord Ayyappa is considered to be a celibate. Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala is particular as he is a celibate and doesn t need the presence of women aged between 10 and 50 as it would have an effect on His penance. When the Lord Himself doesn t want them who're we to mention they have to be allowed quipped Mr Parasaran I have two obligations - one to the Lords here inside the court docket and other to the Lord above all people he argued.The attorney argued that while the Hindu faith is very tolerant and by and large doesn t discriminate But there are aberrations he stated.The problem have to not be approached with notions of patriarchy he contended arguing that the courtroom have to aside from being attentive to the voice of activists need to additionally pay attention out those looking for to defend subculture.The judges have indicated throughout the listening to that they might take a look at the order banning entry of women in opposition to the constitutional right to equality earlier than regulation and it appears not likely that it'd skip this take a look at.Justice Rohinton Nariman reiterated the factor. The notification barring ladies of elderly among 10 and 50 will violate the essential rights of women. Any law or notification that violates fundamental rights is unconstitutional the decide said. The notification isn't always most effective for the worshippers however also for the temple board to preserve the religious practices observed Mr Parasaran concluded his arguments on an emotional observe pointing to the 68 years of practice as a lawyer.The Supreme Court is probably to order the verdict after finishing the hearing tomorrow. NEW DELHI: Making it clear that essential rights do no longer offer iron cast safety for vital and vital non secular practices the Supreme Court on Wednesday found that such traditions may be struck down as unconstitutional if they discriminate on grounds of caste or sex. Hearing a batch of petitions hard Sabarimala Ayappa temple s custom of barring entry of girls in 10-50 age organization a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices RF Nariman AM Khanwilkar DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra said each Article 15 and Article 25(2) enjoin a obligation on constitutional courts and governments to behave in opposition to a non secular practice discriminatory in the direction of ladies. Appearing for Nair Services Society senior propose and previous legal professional general K Parasaran stated the Sabarimala Temple custom does now not discriminate towards girls as it lets in entry for the ones below 10 years and above 50 years. Lord Ayappa is a naishthik brahmachari. The devotees consider in the God s pristine celibate nation that is the purpose why women within the menstruating age group aren't allowed access... He stated. The legal professional s arguments at the intricacies and nuances of Hindu faith and spirituality succeeded in in brief halting the bench s preference to check the temple s customs at the constitutional touchstone. Justices Nariman and Chandrachud waited until Parasaran completed his robust faith-lined arguments to attention on Article 25(2) which furnished that legislature can enact a law to offer for social welfare and reforms or throwing open of Hindu spiritual establishments of a public individual to all classes and sections of Hindus . Both judges stated the subject of Article 25 is meant to use to all religions and when the Constitution says no religion can discriminatingly restriction ladies it applies to all religions. Parasaran said Articles 15 17 and 25 did no longer bar the legislature from enacting laws to herald social reforms however the Constitution via a essential proper has covered practices and customs which might be vital and imperative to a non secular denomination. Justice Chandrachud stated: Even if it is a part of Hindu spiritual custom to exclude any unique class from getting into the temple the state has been empowered (by the Constitution) to enact a regulation to throw open temples to all categories of men and women. Justice Nariman stated on account that untouchability and discrimination on ground of intercourse is illegal underneath the Constitution the Sabarimala Temple custom to bar access of girls in a certain age group can also fall foul of constitutional ethos.