Aadhaar is blind to purpose of validation: UIDAI CEO

MUMBAI: Banks are watching an extra mortgage-loss provisioning of a few thousand crore rupees inside the cutting-edge region after the Supreme Court on Thursday ordered to maintain fame quo on RCom s sale of belongings to Reliance Jio. The courtroom will hear the plea of RCom s lenders on April 5 and if the problem goes to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) then the asset sale might also get behind schedule dealing a further blow to the banks. Many banks have no longer declared the account as a non-appearing asset. So there might be a clean postpone in recovery from this (RCom) account as it's miles probably to be embroiled in a legal tangle said a banker aware about the development. Our massive worry is if the decision can be determined below the NCLT it may be entangled similarly and not on time stated every other character. You are already seeing what is taking place with cases already attempted underneath NCLT so this could be headed the equal way. State Bank of India had moved the Supreme Court on Wednesday tough a tribunal s order permitting Ericsson to stake a declare on RCom s consolidated property. The Bombay High Court upheld the tribunal s order in favour of the Swedish system maker which is attempting to get better dues from RCom. RCom owes Indian lenders Rs. 42 000 crore. SBI that is owed over Rs.Four 000 crore through RCom had appealed towards Ericsson an unsecured creditor getting precedence over secured creditors. Apart from SBI there are 24 creditors such as Bank of Baroda Bank of India Canara Bank Central Bank of India Punjab National Bank IDBI Bank UCO Bank Indian Overseas Bank Dena Bank Corporation Bank Union Bank United Bank LIC and Barclays Bank. State-run Union Bank of India had categorized RCom as a nonperforming mortgage within the quarter ended December. Bankers had cut a address Jio which agreed to buy RCom s spectrum mobile towers and other infrastructure along with 1.Seventy eight lakh km of fibre optics from RCom for Rs. 17 three hundred crore. After the deal became finalised Ericsson moved an arbitration tribunal to restrain the sale of belongings on the grounds that it had a declare of Rs. 1 one hundred fifty crore. .Tale-content material span .Tale-content p .Tale-content div color:#000!Vital;font-circle of relatives: open sans Arial!Vital;font-length:15px!Crucial ALSO READ Ambani dials Ambani: Jio to shop for RCom s mobile biz assets for Rs 24 000 cr Mega deal among Ambanis to help Reliance Jio take on Bharti Airtel RCom stock zooms; SBI says deal protects creditors interest Jio can also bid for RCom s India assets for Rs 18 000 cr: Report RCom revamp plan recap: Airtel Jio eye assets; tower deal to be remodeled span.P-content material div identity = div-gpt line-peak:zero;font-length:zero The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered popularity quo to https://www.sparkfun.com/users/1311678 be maintained inside the sale of Anil Ambani-led Reliance Communications airwaves fibre and towers to Relaince Jio for Rs240 billion. A consortium of creditors led by using State Bank of India (SBI) had challenged the stay order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on the proposed sale. The Supreme Court refused to raise the stay order or revoke the Bombay High Court March 8 order which had brushed off an RCom plea against it. The NCLT have been moved through Swedish telecommunication device maker Ericsson. The SC Bench of Justice Adarsh Goel said a full hearing of the case might be held on April five. RCom owes Rs450 billion to public region banks and exited a strategic debt restructuring plan in December last year after it confident them that it might pay off debt by using promoting its assets to Jio. The sale is critical for RCom to pay off debt via March. Else it can be sent to the NCLT beneath the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Banks could also have to make extra provision for its loans if RCom failed to meet its provisions. Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta acting for the banks said they have been secured creditors and their claims have to take precedence over that of an unsecured lender which includes Ericsson. He also informed the Bench that the fee of the property become depreciating. Senior advise Ranjit Kumar performing for Ericsson said if the stay order become vacated the business enterprise might continue to be treatment-less and may not get its dues again. RCom owes it Rs10.12 billion equipment supplied to its now closed wireless operations. Offshore buyers led with the aid of HSBC Daisy Investments (Mauritius) are also fighting to prevent the sale of tower belongings held by means of a RCom unit. If Ericsson s petition is admitted via the NCLT then the organization s board will be suspended and an insolvency professional appointed to supervise the corporation s sale or liquidation. China Development Bank (CDB) RCom s biggest creditor had filed a comparable petition ultimate yr however withdrew it after RCom announced the proposed deal with Jio and Anil Ambani flew to China to apprise CDB s management about the transaction. RCom is in talks to promote its business communications property at a valuation of almost 1.2 billion with 5 bidders along with a New York-primarily based private fairness company in the race Financial Times said on Thursday. RCom s corporation enterprise consists of worldwide submarine cable network fixed-line telecom network and information centres in India. An RCom spokesperson however said the news was hypothesis . New Delhi: Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) CEO Ajay Pandey were given a unique possibility to make a PowerPoint presentation inside the Supreme Court on Thursday to guard the authorities s bold Aadhaar scheme. The courtroom became the centre of enchantment for attorneys litigants and newshounds as probable for the first time projectors had been set up to enable the UIDAI CEO to make a case in favour of Aadhaar. Representational photo. News18 Pandey a 1984-batch IAS officer of Maharashtra cadre who has been heading UIDAI for the reason that 2010 allayed worries about statistics protection and said the statistics is protected by a 2048-bit encryption and once biometrics involves us it's going to in no way go away . Making use of two projectors he said breaking the Aadhaar encryption may additionally take greater than the age of the universe for the fastest computer on earth . The bench questioned the CEO on his plea that Aadhaar became infallible asking why the UIDAI blacklisted 49 000 registered operators. Pandey stated the retailers had been blacklisted for indulging in corruption carelessness and harassment of the public. It sounds somehow ordinary which you blacklisted 49 000 of your operators for harassing humans the bench requested. Initially we trusted these operators however they ended up registering timber Lord Hanuman Jamun timber and so forth Pandey spoke back. On the difficulty of failure of authentication he said if a biometric authentication does no longer work the officers have been advised to test the Aadhaar card and notice that the case is true. A person must now not be denied blessings due to the fact there is failure in authentication the CEO https://jayerajis.wufoo.com/forms/untitled-form/ who will keep along with his presentation on 27 March said. The bench then requested him approximately the loss of life of a female in Jharkhand after she changed into denied ration for need of Aadhaar authentication. Pandey stated he changed into aware about the case and it turned into now not the case of failure of authentication. The authentication changed into performed and Aadhaar information matched; it was a case of dishonesty on part of the shopkeeper of the fair price keep he stated. It turned into the failure of honesty and now not the failure of Aadhaar additional solicitor wellknown Tushar Mehta who represents UIDAI said. The UIDAI CEO stated that from 1 July Aadhaar could encompass the face except the fingerprints and iris for authentication. At the begin of the presentation a technical snag brought about no longer functioning of one of the projectors dealing with the legal professionals and litigants. The glitch became rectified later. #Aadhaar #Ajay Pandey #NewsTracker #Powerpoint #Supreme Court #UIDAI #Unique Identification Authority Of India NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has requested the Centre the way it was planning to cope with economic exclusion of the susceptible if they failed to pick out themselves the use of Aadhaar cards. Why is the authorities now not being upfront on monetary exclusion?... The Cabinet Secretary did take action on this (notification asking authorities departments to accept alternative IDs). This suggests that the authorities was worried by monetary exclusion. How do you cope with administrative problems? We aren't castigating you however we will be abdicating our constitutional responsibilities if we do now not cope with it Justice DY Chandrachud a member of the 5-decide https://www.zintro.com/profile/zib755c5b7?ref=Zib755c5b7 bench listening to the Aadhaar case said. Justice AK Sikri demanded to understand from Attorney General KK Venugopal why the authorities wasn t deliberating much less invasive ways of ascertaining the identity of a resident. In Singapore too everybody has to have an identification card with a chip. The chip includes all information. The government doesn t have any data. What is the necessity of accumulating and aggregating information and maintaining it for all time? Why is all this wished Justice Sikri requested. Defending Aadhaar the AG stated that the critical facts depository was surrounded by using a thick wall although bodily safety rarely mattered for records hackers. He additionally provided that the UIDAI should make a technical electricity-point presentation to the courtroom to cast off misgivings on the safety of data accumulated under the scheme. The bench has agreed to a presentation on Thursday. The AG s arguments centred across the authorities s willpower to stop leakages inside the PDS gadget for the terrible. The authorities had stored Rs 45 000 crore through Aadhaar by means of plugging leakages. He mentioned that the poor s proper to meals and bodily lifestyles must be triumphant over right to privateness of these protesting in opposition to Aadhaar s obligatory nature. The negative aren't right here complaining he said. The AG also quoted Rajiv Gandhi that of every rupee earmarked for the bad simplest 15 paisa reached the terrible. Justice Chandrachud however disputed his claims citing Amartya Sen s argument that the Bengal famine toll become excessive because there has been no political liberty. Distributive economic justice and political liberty aren't antithetical to each other he said. The AG clarified that Aadhaar became no longer a must for nonresident Indians. He will preserve his arguments on Thursday. Written through Shalini Nair Lalmani Verma 4:fifty nine am The BJP need to introspect why are allies upset or are quitting the alliance. Even the outcomes of the bypolls are indicative of this stated LJP MP Mehboob Ali Kaiser (In image: LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan) Related News UIDAI s Aadhaar gem: Fastest laptop will take lifestyles of universe to breach Behind Supreme Court order on SC/ST Act Parliament panel document that felt existing laws are insufficientIPC may be used if fake instances filed: What government told Supreme Court on the SC/ST Atrocities ActAfter Lok Sabha MPs three ministers within the Narendra Modi authorities Thursday confused the need for a evaluate petition following the Supreme Court s choice to dilute stringent provisions below the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. While Minister for Social Justice and Empowerment Thaawarchand Gehlot took a greater cautious stand that the sort of petition would require the law ministry s inputs two NDA allies Minister of State for Social Justice Ramdas Athawale who heads Republican Party of India (A) and Union Cabinet Minister and leader of Lok Jan Shakti Party (LJP) Ram Vilas Paswan said the Centre need to record a evaluate petition. Gehlot told The Indian Express that he mentioned the Supreme Court order Thursday with Law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and BJP National leader Amit Shah. They said that they will take a look at the matter and we will take further action on their guidelines. For now It seems like there is probably a need for a overview petition however the final selection could be primarily based on what our law minister advises he stated SC/ST Act: BJP s Dalit MPs need government to file evaluate petition in opposition to SC order His junior minister Athawale said he was sad with the Supreme Court order and termed it one-sided and unjust to Dalits and Adivasis . Athawale too stated he met with Shah and Jaitley and that the former confident him that he has directed Law Minister Prasad to examine the court docket order and take a choice on submitting a evaluation petition. The Congress has alleged that the government attorneys did now not argue the case well in the court docket. But the government is ready for a overview petition. This government isn't always anti-Dalit however is concerned about the problem of Dalit atrocities. It changed into Modi government that moved amendments to the Atrocities Act in 2015 and made it more potent he said. While the Supreme Court order changed into criticised via Dalit rights corporations and even Dalit MPs from BJP as weakening the legislation the Congress hit out on the government for the inept dealing with of the case through the Additional Solicitor General. Read two special views on Supreme Court order Citing misuse of the Atrocities Act the two-judge Supreme Court bench of Justices UU Lalit and AK Goel Tuesday laid down stringent safeguards including provisions for anticipatory bail and a preliminary inquiry earlier than registering a case below the Act. Athawale stated that he disagreed with the apex court s view that there were many false cases. When a Dalit lady is raped a Dalit boy is murdered for falling his love with a female of some other caste a Dalit s house is burnt he's assaulted the Atrocities Act ought to practice mechanically. Every 12 months the police sign in 47 000 cases below the Act. Of those the rare opportunity of false instances happens if two human beings have a confrontation and the Atrocities Act is slapped at the non-SC man or woman on account that he verbally abused the SC individual by means of his caste call he said. According to him the Atrocities Act changed into enacted in 1989 after statistics showed Dalit atrocities had elevated no matter the Protection of Civil Rights Act 1955. The law changed into introduced in following a detailed discussion in Parliament wherein all MPs agreed at the need for a stronger law that makes the offence non-bailable. How can the court allow anticipatory bail in this type of case? Also the Act does no longer say some thing approximately taking previous sanction of a better authority before arresting the accused. No better officer is extra than the regulation. The law is the final word he stated He additionally stated that in the call of misuse the SC order diluted a totally important law for Dalit rights. The regulation become now not added in to do similarly injustice to Dalits however to behave towards people who problem them to any injustice he said. Paswan stated his party would have a look at the prison options because the LJP isn't a party inside the case and then document a overview petition next week on its very own. He stated that he had spoken to Gehlot and now LJP leaders might additionally meet BJP president Amit Shah on the issue quickly. There is an ecosystem of despair among SCs and STs due to the order Paswan said. Pointing out that act become made more stringent with the aid of the Narendra Modi government he said that the Congress became taking undue benefit of the problem and the usage of it for political profits and therefore it was important for the BJP to send out a message by filing a evaluate petition. LJP parliamentary board Chairperson Chirag Paswan stated that dilution of the Atrocities Act may want to cause an boom in atrocities against SCs and STs in which crime is devoted in opposition to them most effective due to the fact they are from a selected caste. He stated that the Act changed into a prison arm for SCs and STs to defend themselves from exploitation. Retired IAS officer P S Krishnan who become Secretary to the authorities of India while the Mandal notification was issued wrote to Gehlot that the authorities might want to move the Prevention of Atrocities Act (1989) and its Amendment brought in 2015 to the Ninth Schedule for safety from judicial review. He also said In the petition/appeal the government ought to gift a holistic image which include the socio-historical background of the Act the intense vulnerability of the SCs and STs and the significance of no longer diluting any of the provisions of the Act. An essential voice inside the Dalit/Tribal rights discourse Krishnan said: Any put off in taking movement by using the Government will result in unfavourable end being drawn through the SCs and STs linking with the piling up of big Post-Matric Scholarship arrears and the ill-conceived order of the UGC dated March five 2018 with the approval of the Ministry of HRD which the Government is now looking for to opposite and apparently intends to document a review petition within the Supreme Court. For all the modern-day India News download Indian Express App More Related News SC/ST Atrocities Act: In NDA distinctive perspectives on Supreme Court order Supreme Court initiates contempt complaints against lawyer Tags: Ram Vilas Paswan ideally suited court docket Mast MalangMar 23 2018 at 11:10 amYesterday law minister Ravi Shankar simply given his lip provider however no concrete warranty or plan. Fekuji what is your Man Ki Baat?(0)(0) Reply EEknath MeshramMar 23 2018 at 10:24 amTHE SC/ST MINISTERS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES WILL BE HUMILIATED AND ABUSED FACE TO FACE SINCE THE POSSIBILITY OF INSTANT ARREST IS WITHDRAWN BY SUPREME COURT. THE UPPER CASTE HINDUS ARE BARBARIC AGAINST SC/ST HISTORICALLY. THE GRADED INEQUALITY AND HIERARCHY OF CASTES IMPOSED SLAVERY ON SC/ST PEOPLE. THE SC/ST MINISTERS MPS AND MLAS WILL BE TREATED LESS THAN ANIMALS AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AGAINST UPPER CASTE HINDUS THEN ONLY THE COWARD SC/ST MINISTERS MPS AND MLAS WILL REALISE AND WAKE UP. BY DILUTING SC/ST ATROCITIES PROTECTION ACT SUPREME COURT WANTS THAT SC/ST PEOPLE MUST GET UNITED AND MUST FIGHT FOR THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS. WITHOUT ATROCITIES SC/ST PEOPLE CANNOT WAKE UP AND PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM ATROCITIES.(1)(3) Reply Mita AgrawalMar 23 2018 at 10:15 amWhat is the illustration of SC ST and minorities in judiciary? Do not say merit while gift chief justice of India himself filed a fake affidavit to get authorities land (proved case) . Judiciary wishes to be reformed.(1)(1) Reply Vinod KumarMar 23 2018 at eight:29 amEveryone is talking in opposition to the delution of the SC/ST atrocities act however nobody is talking of its misuse. I myself am the sufferer if this act. In 2012 I ran a small industrial unit in SGM Nagar Faridabad. Just contrary become a SC class postmaster. He and his wife were quarrelsome human beings / continually ready to fight. People avoided them. They asked me shut my unit in any other case ..... One day they called few of us - small unit proprietors - (five folks ) to their residence and requested us to relocate the devices elsewhere. When we objected they became competitive and abusive. They threatened that if we do now not shut gadgets they may complain to police that we known as them by using cast (chamaar). We were given scared and went to police. Surprisingly police asked us now not to file complaint as ultimately their grievance may be entertained now not ours - although they hotel grievance after our FIR. That is how this act is misused.(9)(1) ReplyMita AgrawalMar 23 2018 at 10:07 amI additionally noticed a brahmin hawker sitting just contrary to the S.C. Competator in equal tiffin business .When Brahmin noticed losing compe ion he started to use declare caste and sick remark towards SC compe or such as remark against his innocent daughters. Every law may be misused. So will there be no regulation?(zero)(1) ReplyMita AgrawalMar 23 2018 at 10:18 amName me a law which can not be misused.(0)(1) Reply MmadanguptaMar 23 2018 at 7:47 amwhy do now not they ask for reservation in military.(4)(zero) ReplyMita AgrawalMar 23 2018 at 10:17 amGive them. When do they oppose?(0)(1) Reply Load More Comments New Delhi: The Supreme Court today directed the Uttar Pradesh authorities to area before it a draft of imaginative and prescient file on safety and upkeep of the Taj Mahal and surroundings inside the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ).The Uttar Pradesh authorities knowledgeable the top court docket that it become running at the vision report which would help inside the safety and upkeep of the seventeenth century mausoleum.It sought 4 weeks time from a bench of justices Madan B Lokur Kurian Joseph and Deepak Gupta for completing the work at the vision document.The bench stated that the Central Empowered Committee will look after the issue of felling of 234 timber for laying pipelines for water supply in the city.Counsel for the country government said 122 km of pipelines out of the a hundred thirty km had already been laid and for last eight km the authorities need to reduce 234 trees and the TTZ had granted permission for it.On February 8 the apex court docket had directed the state authorities to location before it a imaginative and prescient report on protection and maintenance of the Taj Mahal.The TTZ is an area of approximately 10 four hundred sq.Km spread over the districts of Agra Firozabad Mathura Hathras and Etah in Uttar Pradesh and Bharatpur in Rajasthan.It had questioned why leather-based industries and motels were arising inside the TTZ while such activities have been stopped earlier.The court docket had in December closing yr stated that an in depth and comprehensive vision record and plan with a futuristic angle which could shield and preserve the iconic monument its environs and the TTZ for as a minimum a few hundred years ought to be prepared.The state authorities had additionally filed an software seeking the court docket s permission to cut 234 trees in Agra for laying pipelines for water supply inside the city.The court docket requested the state authorities to apprise it within four weeks on where land to plant trees turned into available within the location and additionally give information about the quantity of trees planted there.Environmentalist M C Mehta who has filed a plea looking for protection of the Taj from the ill-effects of polluting gases and deforestation in and around the location had advised the bench that he had attended a assembly of the government worried to discuss the problem associated with protection of the monument. CommentsThe TTZ had earlier told the court docket that a no creation sector became declared in a-500 metre radius region of the Taj and the kingdom authorities had envisaged a comprehensive plan to ensure balance among environment and improvement.The top court docket has been monitoring tendencies in the vicinity to defend the monument constructed by means of Mughal emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his spouse Mumtaz Mahal in 1631. The mausoleum is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The Supreme Court has directed Jaiprakash Associates to deposit Rs 200 crore with the courtroom registry before May 10. The first instalment of Rs 100 crore the courtroom ordered has to be deposited via April 15 while the second and the final by using May 10 this year.As of now the Jaiprakash Associates has deposited Rs 550 crore out of a total of Rs 2 000 crore ordered by means of the apex courtroom. The cash may be used to make refunds to the buyers who've sought refund for their investments in a project Jaypee Wish Town in Greater Noida.The Chief Justice Dipak Misra stated You can t take a seat with the home customers money. We are involved with the home shoppers. Once the primary tranche of Rs one hundred crore is deposited through April 15 the apex courtroom will soak up the case on April 16 that's a day later. The courtroom will then determine as to https://speakerdeck.com/soorajpanchol how to disburse the money on a seasoned rata basis to individuals who need refund.The courtroom changed into informed that out of a total of 31 000 domestic buyers there are 2 800 consumers who want refund of money. CommentsThe court also ordered that the Jaypee Associates must not problem call for word for instalments to domestic buyers who are looking for a reimbursement. The developer made a submission in the courtroom that it intends to complete the project and it's far spending money from its personal pocket for the equal.The courtroom struggle commenced after the shoppers of Jaypee Wish Town moved the courtroom. The remember became triggered after a subsidiary of Jaiprakash Associates Jaypee Infratech turned into taken for financial ruin.